![]() This happens somewhat often in my database, as I have econ papers that have two versions - a published paper and a working paper version of that paper (which often contains much more information and data then the published version). The problem comes when you have two references with the same authors, title, and year. The formula seems to be something like "/network/publication/author1-author2-sometitle-yyyy". Hi, the links for a particular publication do not appear to always be unique. " Alstads\aeter" instead of "Alstadsæter"." \$1 Trillion" instead of "$1 Trillion"." r $>$ g" instead of "r > g" (this shows up properly for me on the library page, but not the publication page for some reason).Here are a few more examples I found from the library: I know dealing with these commands is something that seems to have been brought up before over the years, and other commands are interpreted correctly, but I've noticed \textendash the most. These are commands which are spit out by the export of Zotero (using Zotero's Better BibTeX add-on), but I believe are typical commands so that things can print properly in LaTeX. Some instances of "\textendash" or "\textendash" appear literally rather than as an actual en dash, "\%" appears rather than just "%", etc. ![]() For example, see this publication which can be found in this library. Hi, I've noticed some LaTeX commands are not being interpreted, both in the title and abstract. If this is something you'd like to discuss privately instead, please feel free to reach out to me at you so much! But I want to make sure we understand all the parameters of this formula so that we can be confident all the links will be accurate. This cuts down on manual work and also keeps the links stable as their reference information changes or is updated. There are hundreds of data sources that need to have their BibBase links input, and I am working with someone else on my team to attempt to automate this process (through Excel) such that we can use the relevant reference information for a source in Zotero to automatically generate what the BibBase link should be given that it seems like a simple formula. Thus, in our internal spreadsheets where we list our data sources, we have a column listing the BibBase publication link for each source. At times we want to be able to link directly to the reference information for a data source on BibBase via the publication links. ![]() As part of the research that is pulling from this literature, we are also using BibBase to list our data sources for various visualizations etc. But could you provide a full list of these characters, or any other detail on how these links are generated?Ĭontext: for my work I am using BibBase to host a large library of publications on wealth inequality. And I know that certain characters are left out, I assume to make things easier with HTML, such as punctuation and accented characters. Is it possible to provide more detail on the formula used to generate publication links? I see that the basic formula is. I think "BibBase link" (or "bibbase link" to go with the rest of the lowercasing) is the clearest, but these are all the examples I could think of that may be clear.ģ) "URL" but also change the current "link" label as described in (2) to make the difference between "link" and "URL" more intuitive, as these still would sound similar. Perhaps you could change the current "link" to be labelled as "reference link", or "link to reference", or "BibBase link", or "citation link"? I'm not sure. Is there a better, more general, term to label this hyperlink? There are three options I see:Ģ) "link" - I think this is the most intuitive label, but this would require changing the current "link" to something else to differentiate it. ![]() This also often confuses others browsing my library because there is also "link" when browsing the library page itself, which is a link to a separate BibBase page for that reference, and it's not clear that "paper" is the url field while "link" is not. The URL field is always displayed as a hyperlink labelled "paper", which comes across as confusing, to me, when viewing a reference for say, a book or book chapter, or anything else (e.g., something that would go in the "misc" item type, such as legal documents or tax forms, of which I have many in one of my libraries).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |